Enbridge called to produce more paperwork
The federal panel reviewing Enbridge’s proposed $5.5-billion Northern Gateway oil pipeline has called on the company to file more information on the pipeline’s design and risks.
■ The construction of tunnels through the Coastal mountains;
■ The high flow rate of 20,000 barrels per hour of oil, and 8,000 barrels per hour of condensate;
■ The potential for far-reaching environmental and human consequences if there is a spill of oil or condensate in populated or environmentally-sensitive areas;
■ And difficult access to the pipeline in all seasons.
Enbridge spokesperson Gina Jordan said the company just received the panel’s findings. After reviewing them, the company may comment, she said.
Stop the Enbridge Pipeline - Support the North Coast Moratorium on Tanker Traffic
The north coast of British Columbia is home to the largest intact temperate rainforest in the world; in addition to the whales that rely on this pristine and quiet shoreline, it is a critical habitat for salmon, coastal wolves, bears, and an entire interdependent ecosystem. Moreover, this coast is the cultural and economic backbone of several First Nations, including the Gitgaàt, Haisla, and Haida. However, in the spring of 2010, the integrity of this coast and the livelihood of the peoples, whales and wildlife that depend on it are currently threatened with irreversible destruction. This threat may become a reality unless we act together to stop the proposed Enbridge pipeline.
Enbridge, the largest pipeline company in Canada, has submitted a proposal to the Canadian government that will establish a twin pipeline from the Albertan tar sands to Kitimat, at which point supertankers, (the size of 3 footballs fields long and one football field wide) will load the petroleum cargo and transport it through the winding channels of the north coast and onward to clients overseas.
What's At Stake
This proposal presents Canada with a pressing environmental, economic and social decision. Approving this project would enlarge oil extraction operations in northern Alberta and would be a major leap backward in the international effort to become oil independent. It would further fuel the rise of oil-economies in developing nations during a time of global reckoning for the past century of oil use, sending them a regressive message as they face their own industrial adolescence. By saying yes to Enbridge, we exonerate countries like China and India and supply them with the perfect excuse: 'If Canada cannot say no to oil, why should we?'
The First Nations communities that would be potentially affected by this project acted quickly and in a unified front to stop the approval of the Enbridge pipeline. Their unanimous rejection of the project is an inspiring and far-sighted political stand, one that may or may not be recognized by the federal review board ruling on the decision. If the federal government does not uphold their legal and fully entitled refusal of this proposal, it will establish a grim precedent for First Nations relations in the decades following peak oil.
Although the corporate supporters of this pipeline project promise revenue and jobs for the Canadian economy, its civic and ecological consequences — impacts that range from probable to certain — would far outweigh and eventually erase any short term economic stimulus.
As the Gulf BP oil disaster drags on, and in the ever-present wake of the Exxon-Valdez spill, the inevitable ramifications of oil trafficking does not need further elaboration. The loss of north coast jobs relating to fisheries and ecotourism and the destruction of the region's subsistence lifestyles would only be a matter of time once supertankers are granted access to our winding channels.
Impact on Whales
In regards to whales, however, the fact of an eventual oil spill is not their only concern; the dangers of ship strikes and noise pollution are for more immediate to these populations that are only now beginning to rebound from half a century of whaling. As we have emphasized throughout this website, all the cetaceans found on this coast rely on its acoustic qualities for feeding, communication, and reproduction. The noise associated with oil supertanker traffic would either cripple their means of survival or drive them away from this coast indefinitely.
To learn more about the controversy surrounding this pipeline proposal, we recommend www.Notankers.ca as a valuable online resource.